City of Rome v. Harbour

195 S.E. 325, 57 Ga. App. 316, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 580
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 11, 1938
Docket26668
StatusPublished

This text of 195 S.E. 325 (City of Rome v. Harbour) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Rome v. Harbour, 195 S.E. 325, 57 Ga. App. 316, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 580 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Felton, J.

On a former appeal to this court of this case it was adjudged that the petition was not subject to general demurrer. Harbour v. Rome, 54 Ga. App. 97 (187 S. E. 231), which judgment was affirmed by the Supreme Court on certiorari. Harbour v. Rome, 184 Ga. 37 (190 S. E. 364). These judgments are the law of this case. The evidence authorized the verdict under the pleadings and it was not error to overrule the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur. Ltmhcm & Parker, for plaintiff in error. Maddox ■& Griffin, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Rome v. Harbour
190 S.E. 364 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
Harbour v. City of Rome
187 S.E. 231 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 S.E. 325, 57 Ga. App. 316, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-rome-v-harbour-gactapp-1938.