City Of Rockford v. Mallinckrodt ARD, Inc.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
City of Rockford, et al. ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No: 17 C 50107 ) Mallinckrodt ARD, Inc., et al. ) ) Defendants. ) Judge Frederick J. Kapala
ORDER Before the court is a report and recommendation (“R&R”) [118] from the magistrate judge that 18 CV 379 be reassigned based on relatedness. Accordingly, there being no written objection to the R&R, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the record and the R&R, the court accepts the R&R and finds that 18 CV 379 and this case are related and that 18 CV 379 should be reassigned from the Eastern Division to Judge Kapala in the Western Division. A copy of this finding will be forwarded to the Executive Committee together with a request that the Committee reassign 18 CV 379 from the Eastern Division to Judge Kapala in the Western Division.
Date: 3/13/2018 ENTER:
FREDERICK J. a District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City Of Rockford v. Mallinckrodt ARD, Inc. (City Of Rockford v. Mallinckrodt ARD, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.