City Of Rockford v. Mallinckrodt ARD, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois·Decided March 13, 2018·No. 3:17-cv-50107·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

City of Rockford, et al. ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No: 17 C 50107 ) Mallinckrodt ARD, Inc., et al. ) ) Defendants. ) Judge Frederick J. Kapala

ORDER Before the court is a report and recommendation (“R&R”) [118] from the magistrate judge that 18 CV 379 be reassigned based on relatedness. Accordingly, there being no written objection to the R&R, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the record and the R&R, the court accepts the R&R and finds that 18 CV 379 and this case are related and that 18 CV 379 should be reassigned from the Eastern Division to Judge Kapala in the Western Division. A copy of this finding will be forwarded to the Executive Committee together with a request that the Committee reassign 18 CV 379 from the Eastern Division to Judge Kapala in the Western Division.

Date: 3/13/2018 ENTER:

FREDERICK J. a District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City Of Rockford v. Mallinckrodt ARD, Inc., (N.D. Ill. 2018).

City Of Rockford v. Mallinckrodt ARD, Inc. (City Of Rockford v. Mallinckrodt ARD, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)