City of Rochester v. Town of Rush

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

City of Rochester v. Town of Rush

37 A.D.2d 795, 324 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3460

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 16, 1971

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 37 A.D.2d 795 (City of Rochester v. Town of Rush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Rochester v. Town of Rush, 37 A.D.2d 795, 324 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3460 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: In this action for an injunction restraining defendants from interfering with plaintiffs’ operation of a solid waste disposal facility, Special Term denied defendants’ motion for a preliminary injunction restraining plaintiffs from operating the facility and granted plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction restraining defendants from interfering with plaintiffs’ operation thereof. We find that the record sufficiently supports the order appealed from and that such order was properly granted. Special Term correctly stated that it was concerned only with temporary relief pending a full trial on the merits, which should be held without delay in order that the vital issues presented may be speedily determined. The case being entitled to a trial preference it should now be placed at the head of-tfhe Trial Calendar. (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term granting preliminary injunction.) Present — Del Vecchio, J. P., Marsh, Moule, Cardamone and Henry, JJ. [67 Misc 2d 328.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: In this action for an injunction restraining defendants from interfering with plaintiffs’ operation of a solid waste disposal facility, Special Term denied defendants’ motion for a preliminary injunction restraining plaintiffs from operating the facility and granted plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction restraining defendants from interfering with plaintiffs’ operation thereof. We find that the record sufficiently supports the order appealed from and that such order was properly granted. Special Term correctly stated that it was concerned only with temporary relief pending a full trial on the merits, which should be held without delay in order that the vital issues presented may be speedily determined. The case being entitled to a trial preference it should now be placed at the head of-tfhe Trial Calendar. (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term granting preliminary injunction.) Present — Del Vecchio, J. P., Marsh, Moule, Cardamone and Henry, JJ. [67 Misc 2d 328.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 795, 324 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-rochester-v-town-of-rush-nyappdiv-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack