City of Rochester Urban Renewal Agency v. Rochester Storage Warehouse

142 A.D.2d 957, 530 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14984
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 7, 1988·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs unless, within 30 days of the entry of the order to be entered hereon, the parties demonstrate compliance with CPLR 5527, in accordance with the following memorandum: The parties purport to have perfected this appeal on a stipulated statement of facts in lieu of submitting a record on appeal. CPLR 5527, however, requires that such statement be submitted to the court from which the appeal is taken for approval, and further provides that the court "may make corrections or additions necessary to present fully the questions raised by the appeal.” Because the record before us does not establish that the parties have complied with the statutory mandate, the appeal is dismissed unless, within 30 days of the entry of this order, such proof is provided. (Appeals from order and judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bonadio, J. — condemnation.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Rochester Urban Renewal Agency v. Rochester Storage Warehouse, 142 A.D.2d 957, 530 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14984 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

142 A.D.2d 957 (City of Rochester Urban Renewal Agency v. Rochester Storage Warehouse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schoonover v. Gardner
265 A.D.2d 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)