City of Rochester Hills v. Fisher

Michigan Supreme Court

City of Rochester Hills v. Fisher

713 N.W.2d 775, 475 Mich. 860, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 983

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMay 24, 2006

Docket130841

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 713 N.W.2d 775 (City of Rochester Hills v. Fisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Rochester Hills v. Fisher, 713 N.W.2d 775, 475 Mich. 860, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 983 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Leave to Appeal Denied.

The motion for immediate consideration is granted. The application for leave to appeal the March 14, 2005, order of the Court of Appeals is denied, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is also denied. Court of Appeals No. 268164.

KELLY, J. I would remand this case to the district court with instructions to vacate the fine imposed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leave to Appeal Denied.

The motion for immediate consideration is granted. The application for leave to appeal the March 14, 2005, order of the Court of Appeals is denied, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is also denied. Court of Appeals No. 268164.

KELLY, J. I would remand this case to the district court with instructions to vacate the fine imposed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

713 N.W.2d 775, 475 Mich. 860, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-rochester-hills-v-fisher-mich-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack