City of Rochester Hills v. Fisher

713 N.W.2d 775, 475 Mich. 860, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 983
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 24, 2006·No. 130841·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Leave to Appeal Denied.

The motion for immediate consideration is granted. The application for leave to appeal the March 14, 2005, order of the Court of Appeals is denied, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is also denied. Court of Appeals No. 268164.

KELLY, J. I would remand this case to the district court with instructions to vacate the fine imposed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Rochester Hills v. Fisher, 713 N.W.2d 775, 475 Mich. 860, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 983 (Mich. 2006).

713 N.W.2d 775 (City of Rochester Hills v. Fisher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DETROIT FREE PRESS, INC. v. City of Southfield
713 N.W.2d 775 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)