City of Robinson v. Hilderbrand

Appellate Court of Illinois

City of Robinson v. Hilderbrand

71 Ill. App. 53, 1897 Ill. App. LEXIS 7

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedSeptember 10, 1897

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 71 Ill. App. 53 (City of Robinson v. Hilderbrand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Robinson v. Hilderbrand, 71 Ill. App. 53, 1897 Ill. App. LEXIS 7 (Ill. Ct. App. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion per Curiam.

This was an action on the case by defendant in error against plaintiff in error, commenced and prosecuted to judgment in the County Court of Crawford County. The declaration charges that plaintiff in error was guilty of negligence in suffering a certain bridge within its corporate limits, and over which it had control, to be and remain in bad and unsafe repair and condition, whereby defendant in error was thrown from a buggy and sustained personal injury.

Plaintiff in error brings the case to this court and assigns, among other errors, that the County Court did not have jurisdiction to try the case.

The statute provides: “ The County Court shall have concurrent jurisdiction with the Circuit Court in all that class of cases wherein justices of the peace now have or may hereafter have jurisdiction, where the amount claimed or the value of the property in controversy shall not exceed one thousand dollars.”

Justices of the peace in this State have not at any time had jurisdiction in actions to recover damages for personal injury caused by negligence, and consequently the County Court had no jurisdiction. The judgment below will therefore be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI