City of Roanoke v. Fain

Alabama Court of Appeals

City of Roanoke v. Fain

179 So. 920, 28 Ala. App. 143, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 87

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 22, 1938

Docket5 Div. 34.

StatusPublished

This text of 179 So. 920 (City of Roanoke v. Fain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Roanoke v. Fain, 179 So. 920, 28 Ala. App. 143, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 87 (Ala. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

The appeal in this case was improvidently taken, and must be dismissed, for that no sufficient judgment or order has been made in the circuit court to sustain an appeal.

The only 'judgment found in this record is an order of the court sustaining defendant's demurrer to plaintiff's complaint. “A judgment sustaining a demurrer to the complaint is not a final judgment from which an appeal will lie.” Wise v. Spears, 200 Ala. 695, 76 So. 869; Gibbs v. Southern Express Company, 201 Ala. 506, 78 So. 860; Eslava v. Jones, 79 Ala. 287, 288.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

The appeal in this case was improvidently taken, and must be dismissed, for that no sufficient judgment or order has been made in the circuit court to sustain an appeal.

The only 'judgment found in this record is an order of the court sustaining defendant's demurrer to plaintiff's complaint. “A judgment sustaining a demurrer to the complaint is not a final judgment from which an appeal will lie.” Wise v. Spears, 200 Ala. 695, 76 So. 869; Gibbs v. Southern Express Company, 201 Ala. 506, 78 So. 860; Eslava v. Jones, 79 Ala. 287, 288.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 So. 920, 28 Ala. App. 143, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-roanoke-v-fain-alactapp-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack