City of River Rouge v. City of Ecorse

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 25, 2013·No. 145845·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

January 25, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

145845 Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack, CITY OF RIVER ROUGE, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 145845 COA: 303920 Wayne CC: 09-003028-CK CITY OF ECORSE, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff- Appellant, v PETER W. MACUGA, and MACUGA, LIDDLE & DUBIN, P.C., Third-Party Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 2, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. January 25, 2013 _________________________________________ p0122 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of River Rouge v. City of Ecorse, (Mich. 2013).

City of River Rouge v. City of Ecorse (City of River Rouge v. City of Ecorse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.