City of Reidsville v. Turner

98 S.E.2d 308, 246 N.C. 338, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 418
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 22, 1957
StatusPublished

This text of 98 S.E.2d 308 (City of Reidsville v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Reidsville v. Turner, 98 S.E.2d 308, 246 N.C. 338, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 418 (N.C. 1957).

Opinion

Per CuRiam.

The trial was conducted in accordance with the law as established by the decisions of this Court. While appellant brings forward thirty-one assignments of error, they relate to incidents of the trial rather than to basic principles of law.

Upon conflicting evidence, the amount of compensation to which respondents Turner were entitled was determined by the jury. Careful consideration fails to disclose error sufficiently prejudicial to petitioner to require a new trial. Having reached this conclusion, it would serve no useful purpose to discuss in detail the background and particulars of the several assignments.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 S.E.2d 308, 246 N.C. 338, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-reidsville-v-turner-nc-1957.