City of Raymondville v. Isabel Elizondo, Noe Espinoza Jr., Roxanne Franco, and Antonio Espinoza
This text of City of Raymondville v. Isabel Elizondo, Noe Espinoza Jr., Roxanne Franco, and Antonio Espinoza (City of Raymondville v. Isabel Elizondo, Noe Espinoza Jr., Roxanne Franco, and Antonio Espinoza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
13-21-00375-CV
City of Raymondville v. Isabel Elizondo, Noe Espinoza Jr., Roxanne Franco, and Antonio Espinoza
On Appeal from the 197th District Court of Willacy County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019-CV-0205-A
JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on
appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered. The
Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERS judgment in
accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellees.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
May 26, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
City of Raymondville v. Isabel Elizondo, Noe Espinoza Jr., Roxanne Franco, and Antonio Espinoza, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-raymondville-v-isabel-elizondo-noe-espinoza-jr-roxanne-franco-texapp-2022.