City of Puyallup v. Pierce Cnty.

Washington Supreme Court

City of Puyallup v. Pierce Cnty.

447 P.3d 164, 193 Wash. 2d 1030

Washington Supreme Court·Decided September 4, 2019·No. No. 97155-2·Published

Opinion

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its September 3, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That both petitions for review are denied.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, CJ. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its September 3, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That both petitions for review are denied.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, CJ. CHIEF JUSTICE

City of Puyallup v. Pierce Cnty., 447 P.3d 164, 193 Wash. 2d 1030 (Wash. 2019).

Pincite

447 P.3d 164 (City of Puyallup v. Pierce Cnty.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.