City of Providence, Rhode Island v. Bats Global Markets, Inc.

Opinion

Boca Raton Melville San Dicgo Robbins Geller Chicago Nashville San Francisco Rud man & Dowd LLP Manhattan Philadelphia Washington, D.C. The motion to seal is GRANTED temporarily. The Court will assess whether to verdlew.com keep the materials at issue redacted when deciding the underlying motion. Lead 619-338-3847 Plaintiffs should strive to ensure that all redactions are narrowly tailored to whatever considerations justify sealing notwithstanding the presumption in favor of public access. See generally Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 597. May 27,2021 S06 ORDERED. VIA ECF The Honorable Jesse M. Furman United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square May 28, 2021 New York, NY 10007 Re: City of Providence, Rhode Island v. BATS Global Markets, Inc., 14-cv-2811-JMF, Letter Motion to Seal Dear Judge Furman: We write on behalf of the Lead Plaintiffs in the above-referenced matter to request that the Court authorize the sealed filing of Lead Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification and the supporting materials. The proposed filing, which we are still finalizing, contains a significant amount of information designated by one or more defendants as Confidential or Highly Confidential under the Protective Order (ECF No. 402). Accordingly, Lead Plaintiffs request that the Court allow the information to be filed under seal. Lead Plaintiffs intend to file a public, redacted version of the brief and certain supporting materials that are not confidential. We appreciate Your Honor’s consideration in this matter. Sincerely,

DAVID W. MITCHELL DWM:

4812-0497-9436.v1 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel 619-231-1058 Fax 619-231-7423 rgrdlaw.com