City of Portland v. Payne
This text of 816 P.2d 1219 (City of Portland v. Payne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Employer seeks review of the Workers’ Compensation Board’s order reversing the referee in part and holding that claimant’s mental stress condition is compensable. We agree with the Board’s interpretation of ORS 656.802(2)(b)1 and its conclusion that the phrase “generally inherent in every working situation” means “usually present in all jobs and occupations.” Housing Authority of Portland v. Zimmerly, 108 Or App 596, 816 P2d 1179 (1991). The Board held, however, that in order to establish a mental disorder under ORS 656.802(1)(b), claimant need only show that her employment materially contributed to her mental disorder. We reverse and remand the case for reconsideration in the light of Aetna Casualty Co. v. Aschbacher, 107 Or App 494, 812 P2d 844 (1991).
Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
816 P.2d 1219, 108 Or. App. 771, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-portland-v-payne-orctapp-1991.