City of Pontiac Retired Employees v. Louis Schimmel

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in City of Pontiac Retired Employees v. Louis Schimmel. Read the opinion of the Court — 751 F.3d 427
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided November 8, 2013·No. 12-2087·Unknown

Opinion

No. 12-2087

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FILED Nov 08, 2013 CITY OF PONTIAC RETIRED EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, ET AL., ) DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk ) Plaintiffs-Appellants, ) ) v. ) ) ORDER LOUIS SCHIMMEL, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY ) AS EMERGENCY MANAGER OF THE CITY OF PONTIAC, ET AL., ) ) Defendants-Appellees. ) ) ) )

BEFORE: BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; BOGGS, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, GIBBONS, ROGERS, SUTTON, COOK, McKEAGUE, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of

this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:

“A decision to grant rehearing en banc vacates the previous opinion and judgment of the court, stays the mandate, and restores the case on the docket as a pending appeal”

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is

vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Pontiac Retired Employees v. Louis Schimmel, (6th Cir. 2013).

City of Pontiac Retired Employees v. Louis Schimmel (City of Pontiac Retired Employees v. Louis Schimmel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.