City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
17 A.3d 917, 610 Pa. 1, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 847
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 6, 2011
Docket564 WAL 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 17 A.3d 917 (City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board, 17 A.3d 917, 610 Pa. 1, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 847 (Pa. 2011).
Opinion
*2 ORDER
AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2011 the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Did the Commonwealth Court err by holding that, in a petition to suspend compensation benefits based upon an alleged voluntary withdrawal from the workforce, the employer bears the burden of showing by the totality of the circumstances that the claimant has chosen not to return to the workforce?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. ROMANSKY
17 A.3d 917 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
17 A.3d 917, 610 Pa. 1, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-pittsburgh-v-workers-compensation-appeal-board-pa-2011.