City of Pittsburgh v. Fraternal Order Police

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

City of Pittsburgh v. Fraternal Order Police

200 A.3d 937

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 16, 2019·No. 293 WAL 2018 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 16th day of January, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the Commonwealth Court ignore this Supreme Court's existing mandate to defer to a grievance arbitrator's straightforward interpretation of contract language by mislabeling her award the construction of an equitable result, thereby weakening the general assembly's intent for Act 111 awards to create a final and binding resolution of contract disputes?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 16th day of January, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the Commonwealth Court ignore this Supreme Court's existing mandate to defer to a grievance arbitrator's straightforward interpretation of contract language by mislabeling her award the construction of an equitable result, thereby weakening the general assembly's intent for Act 111 awards to create a final and binding resolution of contract disputes?

City of Pittsburgh v. Fraternal Order Police, 200 A.3d 937 (Pa. 2019).

Pincite

200 A.3d 937 (City of Pittsburgh v. Fraternal Order Police) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related