City of Phoenix, Arizona v. Michael Huerta (ORDER)

881 F.3d 932
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedFebruary 7, 2018
Docket15-1158
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 881 F.3d 932 (City of Phoenix, Arizona v. Michael Huerta (ORDER)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Phoenix, Arizona v. Michael Huerta (ORDER), 881 F.3d 932 (D.C. Cir. 2018).

Opinion

ORDER

Per Curiam

Upon consideration of the joint petition for panel rehearing, it is

ORDERED that the opinion issued August 29, 2017, be amended as follows:

Slip Op., p. 20, Part IV, line 3, insert the word “departure” before the word “routes” and delete the words “and procedures”. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment of the court issued August 29, 2017, be vacated. The Clerk is directed to issue a new judgment. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate until June 15, 2018, unless the parties notify the court prior to that date that the mandate should issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eagle County, Colorado v. STB
82 F.4th 1152 (D.C. Circuit, 2023)
Howard County, Maryland v. FAA
970 F.3d 441 (Fourth Circuit, 2020)
Solenex LLC v. Zinke
District of Columbia, 2018
Solenex LLC v. Jewell
334 F. Supp. 3d 174 (D.C. Circuit, 2018)
Moncrief v. U.S. Dep't of Interior
339 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.C. Circuit, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
881 F.3d 932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-phoenix-arizona-v-michael-huerta-order-cadc-2018.