City of Phoenix, Arizona v. Michael Huerta (ORDER)

D.C. Circuit

City of Phoenix, Arizona v. Michael Huerta (ORDER)

881 F.3d 932

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided February 7, 2018·No. 15-1158·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Per Curiam

Upon consideration of the joint petition for panel rehearing, it is

ORDERED that the opinion issued August 29, 2017, be amended as follows:

Slip Op., p. 20, Part IV, line 3, insert the word “departure” before the word “routes” and delete the words “and procedures”. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment of the court issued August 29, 2017, be vacated. The Clerk is directed to issue a new judgment. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate until June 15, 2018, unless the parties notify the court prior to that date that the mandate should issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per Curiam

Upon consideration of the joint petition for panel rehearing, it is

ORDERED that the opinion issued August 29, 2017, be amended as follows:

Slip Op., p. 20, Part IV, line 3, insert the word “departure” before the word “routes” and delete the words “and procedures”. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment of the court issued August 29, 2017, be vacated. The Clerk is directed to issue a new judgment. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate until June 15, 2018, unless the parties notify the court prior to that date that the mandate should issue.

City of Phoenix, Arizona v. Michael Huerta (ORDER), 881 F.3d 932 (D.C. Cir. 2018).

Pincite

881 F.3d 932 (City of Phoenix, Arizona v. Michael Huerta (ORDER)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related