City of Philadelphia v. River Front Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

City of Philadelphia v. River Front Railroad

34 A. 60, 173 Pa. 334, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 706

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 27, 1896

DocketAppeal, No. 380

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 34 A. 60 (City of Philadelphia v. River Front Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Philadelphia v. River Front Railroad, 34 A. 60, 173 Pa. 334, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 706 (Pa. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

There was no error in making the decrees referred to in the first specification, nor in dismissing the exceptions to the master’s report recited in the third specification. The questions involved in the assignments of error, so far as they are material, have been so fully considered by the learned master that we deem it unnecessary to add anything to what he has said.

The decree is affirmed on his report, and the appeal is dismissed with costs to be paid by the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

There was no error in making the decrees referred to in the first specification, nor in dismissing the exceptions to the master’s report recited in the third specification. The questions involved in the assignments of error, so far as they are material, have been so fully considered by the learned master that we deem it unnecessary to add anything to what he has said.

The decree is affirmed on his report, and the appeal is dismissed with costs to be paid by the defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A. 60, 173 Pa. 334, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-philadelphia-v-river-front-railroad-pa-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack