City of Philadelphia v. McManes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

City of Philadelphia v. McManes

34 A. 331, 175 Pa. 28, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1201

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 6, 1896·No. Appeal, No. 16·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We find nothing in this record to justify a reversal or modification of the decree dismissing the bill at plaintiff’s costs. The questions involved — so far as they are at all material — were carefully considered and correctly decided by the court below.. All that can be profitably said in relation to either of them will be found in the clear, concise and exhaustive opinion of its learned president. On that opinion, the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We find nothing in this record to justify a reversal or modification of the decree dismissing the bill at plaintiff’s costs. The questions involved — so far as they are at all material — were carefully considered and correctly decided by the court below.. All that can be profitably said in relation to either of them will be found in the clear, concise and exhaustive opinion of its learned president. On that opinion, the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the plaintiff.

City of Philadelphia v. McManes, 34 A. 331, 175 Pa. 28, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1201 (Pa. 1896).

Pincite

34 A. 331 (City of Philadelphia v. McManes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related