City of Philadelphia Petition

89 Pa. D. & C. 189, 1954 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 388
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
DecidedApril 28, 1954
Docketno. 3119
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 89 Pa. D. & C. 189 (City of Philadelphia Petition) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Philadelphia Petition, 89 Pa. D. & C. 189, 1954 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 388 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1954).

Opinion

Hagan, J.

This is a proceeding under the Act of May 21, 1921, P. L. 1054, 53 PS §§6757 et seq., in which the City of Philadelphia has filed a petition seeking the exclusion from its general indebtedness of a total of $37,750,000 proposed indebtedness about to be invested in the water supply system, the sewer system, and the Frankford Avenue trackless trolley line, as authorized by ordinances of the Council of the City of Philadelphia, approved March 31, 1953, and August 28, 1953.

The Act of 1921 implements section 8 of article IX of the Constitution of Pennsylvania, which created for Philadelphia a special class of indebtedness to be in[190]*190vested in self-sustaining public improvements and utilities which may be incurred without regard to the limitation on the city’s borrowing power. The Constitution provides that when the City of Philadelphia shall have incurred or is about to incur indebtedness expended or to be expended for any public improvement or utility which may reasonably be expected to yield revenues in excess of operating expenses sufficient to pay the interest and sinking fund charges thereon, such indebtedness may be excluded in ascertaining the debt-incurring capacity of the city.

On March 26, 1954, the city filed its petition, which was signed and sworn to by Joseph S. Clark, Jr., Mayor of the City of Philadelphia, and attested by the appropriate city officials in accordance with the requirements of the Act of May 21, 1921, P. L. 1054. Thereupon the court entered an order fixing April 23, 1954, at 10 a.m., in Room 243 City Hall, as the time and place for making the application pursuant to the prayer of the petition, and ordering publication of the notice of the hearing, in accordance with the requirements of the act. Publication was made in accordance with the order, and proof thereof was filed with the court.

The sole issue raised by this proceeding is one of fact: May the public improvements or utilities in which the proceeds of the proposed indebtedness are to be invested reasonably be expected to produce revenues to the city in excess of operating expenses sufficient to pay the interest and sinking fund charges on such indebtedness? If so, such indebtedness comes within the special class which’under the Constitution and the Act of 1921, may be excluded from the calculation of its general indebtedness in determining the city’s borrowing capacity.

At the hearing held on this petition on April 23, [191]*1911954, the city placed in evidence a series of exhibits showing a five-year projection, from 1954 to 1958, inclusive, of the net revenues which the water supply system and the sewer system of the city may reasonably be expected to yield during that period; and demonstrating that said net revenues, together with existing surplus, will be sufficient to pay the interest and sinking fund charges on the indebtedness invested or about to be invested in the water supply system and sewer system during the five-year period under consideration. With respect to the Frankford Avenue trackless trolley line, the city placed in evidence estimates projected through a six-year period, from 1954 to 1959, inclusive, showing that this trolley line may reasonably be expected to yield net revenues during said period sufficient to pay the interest and sinking fund charges on the indebtedness to be invested in the project.

As we stated in our memorandum opinion in City of Philadelphia Petition, 83 D. & C. 581, section 8 of art. IX of the Constitution does not provide any specific test period to determine the productivity of a self-sustaining utility, as does section 15 of art. IX for other municipalities. Section 15, which has been implemented by the Municipal Borrowing Law of June 25, 1941, P. L. 159, sec. 601, 53 PS §2011.601, accepts a five-year performance history as a satisfactory test of a self-sustaining public improvement. Therefore, the evidence produced by the city that a five-year projection of net revenues, interest and sinking fund charges with respect to the water supply system and the sewer system, and a six-year projection of the net revenues, interest and sinking fund charges with respect to the Frankford Avenue trackless trolley line is sufficient to sustain findings that the revenue to be derived by the city from the munici[192]*192pal projects may reasonably be expected to yield sums in excess of operating costs sufficient to pay the interest and sinking fund charges on the indebtedness.

In this connection, it is to be observed that under section 5-801 of the Philadelphia Home Rule Charter the Water Department of the City of Philadelphia' (which operates the city’s water supply system and the city’s sewer system) is required to fix rates and charges for the operation of the water supply system and the sewer system at levels sufficient to yield to the city an amount at least equal to operating expenses, interest and sinking fund charges on any debts incurred in the operation of said systems.

The only legal questions involved in this proceeding have already been determined in earlier proceedings brought under the Act of 1921. Two such questions were decided by this court in City of Philadelphia Petition 83 D. & C. 581 (C. P. No. 1, Philadelphia Co., 1953). First, we held that indebtedness invested in self-sustaining public improvements should be completely excluded and not merely deducted from the general indebtedness of the city in ascertaining its constitutional borrowing capacity. In so holding we relied on the decision of the Supreme Court of this State in Atkins v. Philadelphia et al., 339 Pa. 345 (1940) in which it was stated that new loans for investment in self-sustaining projects may be floated whether or not the city has any general borrowing capacity.

Second, we held that, upon application of the principles of statutory construction, “the conclusion is inescapable that the city is authorized to single out the indebtedness of one of its self-liquidating projects for separate presentation to the court” (83 D. & C. 581, 593). Accordingly, we concluded that the Act of 1921 does not require the city to bring before the [193]*193court all of its self-sustaining projects for review each time a proceeding is instituted for the exclusion of indebtedness to be invested in such a self-sustaining project.

A third question involved in this proceeding, relating to the Frankford Avenue trackless trolley line, was determined in City of Philadelphia Petition, 76 D. & C. 156 (C. P. No. 5, Philadelphia Co., 1951). In that case it was held that the requirements of the Act of 1921 are met when a lease is made with an operating company under the terms of which the rental payable by the lessee to the city is in excess of the operating expenses, interest and sinking fund charges payable by the city. The court there held that the amount of revenues derived by the lessee from the operation of the improvement was immaterial and the fact that such revenues might be less than the operating expenses of the lessee or less than the amount of the rental payable by the lessee to the city was of no concern. Accordingly, if the city incurs no cost of operation in connection with the facilities and if the lease agreement provides for the payment to the city of a sum sufficient to meet the interest and sinking fund charges payable on the indebtedness the proceeds of which are invested in the leased facilities, the project meets the requirements of the Act of 1921 and such indebtedness may be excluded in ascertaining the borrowing capacity of the city.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Philadelphia Indebtedness Exclusion Petition
254 A.2d 628 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 Pa. D. & C. 189, 1954 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-philadelphia-petition-pactcomplphilad-1954.