City of Phila. v. Galdo, F.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

City of Phila. v. Galdo, F.

194 A.3d 1043

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 2, 2018·No. 181 EAL 2018 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Was President Judge Pellegrini correct in dissent that the Commonwealth Court Majority's conclusion - that the property here, acquired by the City through a public-purpose condemnation designed to assist the Commonwealth with the construction of I-95, and then held for subsequent resale, was subject to adverse possession - was mistaken and in conflict with Superior Court precedent?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Was President Judge Pellegrini correct in dissent that the Commonwealth Court Majority's conclusion - that the property here, acquired by the City through a public-purpose condemnation designed to assist the Commonwealth with the construction of I-95, and then held for subsequent resale, was subject to adverse possession - was mistaken and in conflict with Superior Court precedent?

City of Phila. v. Galdo, F., 194 A.3d 1043 (Pa. 2018).

Pincite

194 A.3d 1043 (City of Phila. v. Galdo, F.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.