Home/Alabama Court of Appeals/City of Phenix City v. Smith-Pittman Tractor Co.

City of Phenix City v. Smith-Pittman Tractor Co.

132 So. 911, 24 Ala. App. 621
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 17, 1931
Docket5 Div. 823.
StatusPublished

This text of 132 So. 911 (City of Phenix City v. Smith-Pittman Tractor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Phenix City v. Smith-Pittman Tractor Co., 132 So. 911, 24 Ala. App. 621 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This cause is affirmed for want of assignment of error in the transcript. Aside from this there appears no merit in any of the insistences of appellant. The judgment rendered appears to be proper and just, and certainly no ruling of the court tended in the least to erroneously affect the substantial right of the defendant on the trial in the lower court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 So. 911, 24 Ala. App. 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-phenix-city-v-smith-pittman-tractor-co-alactapp-1931.