City of Pgh ZBA,et al., Pet v. Lamar Advantage
This text of City of Pgh ZBA,et al., Pet v. Lamar Advantage (City of Pgh ZBA,et al., Pet v. Lamar Advantage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
LAMAR ADVANTAGE GP COMPANY, LLC, : No. 409 WAL 2019 : Respondents : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court : : CITY OF PITTSBURGH ZONING BOARD : OF ADJUSTMENT AND CITY OF : PITTSBURGH, : : Petitioners :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all
remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Whether the holding of the panel in this matter that a static vinyl advertising sign could replace an electronic advertising sign was inconsistent with the holding in Lamar Advertising Co. v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of the Municipality of Monroeville, 939 A.2d 994 (Pa.Commw. Ct. 2007) that static vinyl advertising signs and electronic advertising signs are so different that one cannot simply replace the other without application for and issuance of a new zoning and building permit?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
City of Pgh ZBA,et al., Pet v. Lamar Advantage, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-pgh-zbaet-al-pet-v-lamar-advantage-pa-2020.