City of Pensacola v. Romero

District Court of Appeal of Florida

City of Pensacola v. Romero

245 So. 2d 91, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6844

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 4, 1971·No. No. N-187·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having [92]*92failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See Smith v. City of Tallahassee, 191 So.2d 446 (Fla.App.1966).

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS, J., and VANN, HAROLD R., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having [92]*92failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See Smith v. City of Tallahassee, 191 So.2d 446 (Fla.App.1966).

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS, J., and VANN, HAROLD R., Associate Judge, concur.

City of Pensacola v. Romero, 245 So. 2d 91, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6844 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

245 So. 2d 91 (City of Pensacola v. Romero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related