City of Pensacola v. Kimberl

Supreme Court of Florida

City of Pensacola v. Kimberl

155 So. 920, 115 Fla. 732, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1674

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 9, 1934·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was a suit against the municipality ■for damages caused by injuries received by the plaintiff in a fall caused by a defective sidewalk. The judgment should •be affirmed on authority of the opinion in the case of City of Jacksonville v. Vaughn, 92 Fla. 339, 110 Sou. 529, and authorities there cited.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This was a suit against the municipality ■for damages caused by injuries received by the plaintiff in a fall caused by a defective sidewalk. The judgment should •be affirmed on authority of the opinion in the case of City of Jacksonville v. Vaughn, 92 Fla. 339, 110 Sou. 529, and authorities there cited.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

City of Pensacola v. Kimberl, 155 So. 920, 115 Fla. 732, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1674 (Fla. 1934).

Pincite

155 So. 920 (City of Pensacola v. Kimberl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related