City of Peculiar v. Rothlisberger
282 S.W.3d 892, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 665, 2009 WL 1372162
This text of 282 S.W.3d 892 (City of Peculiar v. Rothlisberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
City of Peculiar v. Rothlisberger, 282 S.W.3d 892, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 665, 2009 WL 1372162 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
Opinion
ORDER
Gary Rothlisberger appeals the judgment of the trial court dismissing his application for trial de novo as untimely. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
282 S.W.3d 892, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 665, 2009 WL 1372162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-peculiar-v-rothlisberger-moctapp-2009.