City of Peculiar v. Rothlisberger
282 S.W.3d 892, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 665, 2009 WL 1372162
Opinion
ORDER
Gary Rothlisberger appeals the judgment of the trial court dismissing his application for trial de novo as untimely. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Peculiar v. Rothlisberger, 282 S.W.3d 892, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 665, 2009 WL 1372162 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
282 S.W.3d 892 (City of Peculiar v. Rothlisberger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.