City of Pasadena v. Railroad Commission
This text of 175 Cal. 812 (City of Pasadena v. Railroad Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a proceeding in mandamus. It is in all respects identical with the case entitled Civic Center Assn, of Los Angeles v. Railroad Commission (L. A. 5028), ante, p. 441, [166 Pac. 351], this day decided, except that the plaintiffs here are the cities of Pasadena, Alhambra, San Gabriel, and South Pasadena, each of which claims a sufficient interest to maintain the proceeding. All other questions, save their right to sue in that behalf, are discussed and decided in the other case. No private right is in issue. The question of their right to maintain such a proceeding is not of itself of enough importance here to justify this court, burdened as it is with the press of real cases, in taking time to consider it.
The proceeding is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
175 Cal. 812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-pasadena-v-railroad-commission-cal-1917.