City of Pasadena v. Azael Sepulveda
Opinion
Opinion issued December 15, 2022
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00242-CV ——————————— CITY OF PASADENA, Appellant V. AZAEL SEPULVEDA, Appellee
On Appeal from the 281st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2021-80180
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant City of Pasadena failed to timely file a brief. Appellant’s brief was
originally due on September 8, 2022. On September 19, 2022, the Court issued a
notice that we might dismiss the appeal if appellant did not file a brief or motion for
extension on or before September 29, 2022. Appellant did not file a timely brief or request an extension.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 38.8(a)(1) (authorizing dismissal for failure to file brief); TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b)
(allowing involuntary dismissal of case). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Hightower, and Guerra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Pasadena v. Azael Sepulveda (City of Pasadena v. Azael Sepulveda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.