City of Pasadena v. Azael Sepulveda

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 15, 2022·No. 01-22-00242-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued December 15, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00242-CV ——————————— CITY OF PASADENA, Appellant V. AZAEL SEPULVEDA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 281st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2021-80180

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant City of Pasadena failed to timely file a brief. Appellant’s brief was

originally due on September 8, 2022. On September 19, 2022, the Court issued a

notice that we might dismiss the appeal if appellant did not file a brief or motion for

extension on or before September 29, 2022. Appellant did not file a timely brief or request an extension.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 38.8(a)(1) (authorizing dismissal for failure to file brief); TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b)

(allowing involuntary dismissal of case). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Hightower, and Guerra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Pasadena v. Azael Sepulveda, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

City of Pasadena v. Azael Sepulveda (City of Pasadena v. Azael Sepulveda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.