City of Panama City v. City of Springfield
This text of 700 So. 2d 101 (City of Panama City v. City of Springfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner, City of Panama City, seeks cer-tiorari jurisdiction in this court to review the circuit court’s order declaring invalid two local annexation ordinances adopted by Petitioner. We grant the writ and reverse the trial court’s order. We are bound to reverse the trial court’s order because Respondents lacked standing to challenge the annexation ordinances. §§ 171.081; 171.031(5), Florida Statutes (1995). Accordingly, we decline to reach the merits of the case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
700 So. 2d 101, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11444, 1997 WL 611769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-panama-city-v-city-of-springfield-fladistctapp-1997.