City of Paducah v. Duke

11 Ky. Op. 46, 2 Ky. L. Rptr. 229, 1881 Ky. LEXIS 130
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided February 15, 1881·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Hines :

It is conceded that the property mortgaged in this case, and which was declared by the court below not to be subject to the mortgage, is the separate estate of the wife. We have decided in the case of Hirschman v. Brashears, 79 Ky. 258, that the power to sell separate estate, conferred by Gen. Stat. (1879), Ch. 52, Art. 4, § 17, does not imply the power to mortgage for the debt of the husband. That case is conclusive of this, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Paducah v. Duke, 11 Ky. Op. 46, 2 Ky. L. Rptr. 229, 1881 Ky. LEXIS 130 (Ky. Ct. App. 1881).

11 Ky. Op. 46 (City of Paducah v. Duke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hirschman v. Brashears
79 Ky. 258 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1881)