City of Orlando v. Haynes

263 So. 3d 285
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 5, 2019
DocketCase No. 5D18-953
StatusPublished

This text of 263 So. 3d 285 (City of Orlando v. Haynes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Orlando v. Haynes, 263 So. 3d 285 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Hayes v. State, 94 So.3d 452, 461 (Fla. 2012) ("[T]he proper remedy when the trial court fails to abide by its duty under the Melbourne[ v. State, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla. 1996) ] procedure is to reverse and remand for a new trial.").

EVANDER, C.J. and GROSSHANS and SASSO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Melbourne v. State
679 So. 2d 759 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Hayes v. State
94 So. 3d 452 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 So. 3d 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-orlando-v-haynes-fladistctapp-2019.