City of Orlando v. Haynes

263 So. 3d 285
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 5, 2019·No. Case No. 5D18-953·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Hayes v. State, 94 So.3d 452, 461 (Fla. 2012) ("[T]he proper remedy when the trial court fails to abide by its duty under the Melbourne[ v. State, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla. 1996) ] procedure is to reverse and remand for a new trial.").

EVANDER, C.J. and GROSSHANS and SASSO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Orlando v. Haynes, 263 So. 3d 285 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

263 So. 3d 285 (City of Orlando v. Haynes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Melbourne v. State
679 So. 2d 759 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Hayes v. State
94 So. 3d 452 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)