City of Orlando v. Florida Public Employees Relations Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

City of Orlando v. Florida Public Employees Relations Commission

338 So. 2d 259, 93 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2994, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15624

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 15, 1976·No. No. 75-2052·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review and consideration of the briefs, record on appeal and oral argument we are of the opinion, based upon the rationale set forth in Panama City v. Florida Public Employees Rel. Com'n, 333 So.2d 470 (Fla.1st DCA 1976) and School Bd. of Sarasota Cty. v. Florida Public Employees Relations Commission, 333 So.2d 95 (Fla.2d DCA 1976), certiorari does not lie at the present time. See also section 120.68(1), Florida Statutes,

CERTIORARI DENIED,

MAGER, C. J., CROSS, J., and SMITH, LARRY G., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon review and consideration of the briefs, record on appeal and oral argument we are of the opinion, based upon the rationale set forth in Panama City v. Florida Public Employees Rel. Com'n, 333 So.2d 470 (Fla.1st DCA 1976) and School Bd. of Sarasota Cty. v. Florida Public Employees Relations Commission, 333 So.2d 95 (Fla.2d DCA 1976), certiorari does not lie at the present time. See also section 120.68(1), Florida Statutes,

CERTIORARI DENIED,

MAGER, C. J., CROSS, J., and SMITH, LARRY G., Associate Judge, concur.

City of Orlando v. Florida Public Employees Relations Commission, 338 So. 2d 259, 93 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2994, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15624 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

338 So. 2d 259 (City of Orlando v. Florida Public Employees Relations Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related