CITY OF ORLANDO POLICE DEPARTMENT v. Rose
974 So. 2d 554, 2008 WL 397458
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 15, 2008·No. 5D07-2393·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
CITY OF ORLANDO POLICE DEPARTMENT, Appellant,
v.
Kwame ROSE and Ashanni Staffine, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
*555 Lee A. Freeman, Orlando, for Appellant.
Kathleen T. Gillard, of Kathleen T. Gillard, PA., Orlando, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The finder of fact is not required to believe the testimony of any witness, even if unrebutted. Dep't of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Dean, 662 So.2d 371 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); State v. Paul, 638 So.2d 537 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
AFFIRMED.
SAWAYA, ORFINGER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
CITY OF ORLANDO POLICE DEPARTMENT v. Rose, 974 So. 2d 554, 2008 WL 397458 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).
974 So. 2d 554 (CITY OF ORLANDO POLICE DEPARTMENT v. Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stanley v. Bank of America, N.A.
199 So. 3d 409 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Riley v. Lien
13 So. 3d 1085 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Fox v. Department of Health
994 So. 2d 416 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
AAA BAIL BONDSMAN SERVICE v. State
974 So. 2d 554 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)