CITY OF ORLANDO POLICE DEPARTMENT v. Rose
This text of 974 So. 2d 554 (CITY OF ORLANDO POLICE DEPARTMENT v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CITY OF ORLANDO POLICE DEPARTMENT, Appellant,
v.
Kwame ROSE and Ashanni Staffine, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
*555 Lee A. Freeman, Orlando, for Appellant.
Kathleen T. Gillard, of Kathleen T. Gillard, PA., Orlando, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The finder of fact is not required to believe the testimony of any witness, even if unrebutted. Dep't of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Dean, 662 So.2d 371 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); State v. Paul, 638 So.2d 537 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
AFFIRMED.
SAWAYA, ORFINGER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
974 So. 2d 554, 2008 WL 397458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-orlando-police-department-v-rose-fladistctapp-2008.