City of Oneonta v. Bentley

Supreme Court of Alabama

City of Oneonta v. Bentley

494 So. 2d 9, 1986 Ala. LEXIS 3586

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedMay 30, 1986

Docket85-23

StatusPublished

This text of 494 So. 2d 9 (City of Oneonta v. Bentley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Oneonta v. Bentley, 494 So. 2d 9, 1986 Ala. LEXIS 3586 (Ala. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on grounds of niootness. Notwithstanding certain language in the trial court’s final decree declaring the subject zoning ordinance void, we interpret the order of adjudication as embracing only the issues raised by the parties. Our order dismissing this appeal is without prejudice to the rights of all parties to litigate any issue other than that of the validity of the rezoning ordinance relating to the McPherson property.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on grounds of niootness. Notwithstanding certain language in the trial court’s final decree declaring the subject zoning ordinance void, we interpret the order of adjudication as embracing only the issues raised by the parties. Our order dismissing this appeal is without prejudice to the rights of all parties to litigate any issue other than that of the validity of the rezoning ordinance relating to the McPherson property.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

494 So. 2d 9, 1986 Ala. LEXIS 3586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-oneonta-v-bentley-ala-1986.