City of Oneonta v. Bentley

Supreme Court of Alabama

City of Oneonta v. Bentley

494 So. 2d 9, 1986 Ala. LEXIS 3586

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided May 30, 1986·No. 85-23·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on grounds of niootness. Notwithstanding certain language in the trial court’s final decree declaring the subject zoning ordinance void, we interpret the order of adjudication as embracing only the issues raised by the parties. Our order dismissing this appeal is without prejudice to the rights of all parties to litigate any issue other than that of the validity of the rezoning ordinance relating to the McPherson property.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on grounds of niootness. Notwithstanding certain language in the trial court’s final decree declaring the subject zoning ordinance void, we interpret the order of adjudication as embracing only the issues raised by the parties. Our order dismissing this appeal is without prejudice to the rights of all parties to litigate any issue other than that of the validity of the rezoning ordinance relating to the McPherson property.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

City of Oneonta v. Bentley, 494 So. 2d 9, 1986 Ala. LEXIS 3586 (Ala. 1986).

Pincite

494 So. 2d 9 (City of Oneonta v. Bentley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.