Home/Supreme Court/City of Omaha v. Frank Bros. Footwear, Inc.

City of Omaha v. Frank Bros. Footwear, Inc.

336 U.S. 935, 69 S. Ct. 745, 93 L. Ed. 1094, 1949 U.S. LEXIS 2625
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 28, 1949
DocketNo. 507
StatusPublished

This text of 336 U.S. 935 (City of Omaha v. Frank Bros. Footwear, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Omaha v. Frank Bros. Footwear, Inc., 336 U.S. 935, 69 S. Ct. 745, 93 L. Ed. 1094, 1949 U.S. LEXIS 2625 (1949).

Opinion

Supreme Court of Nebraska. Certio[936]*936rari denied.

Ralph E. Svoboda for petitioners. Charles S. Rhyne filed a brief for the National Institute of Municipal Law Officers, as amicus curiae, supporting the petition. M. James Spitser filed a brief for Best & Co., Inc., as amicus curiae, opposing the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
336 U.S. 935, 69 S. Ct. 745, 93 L. Ed. 1094, 1949 U.S. LEXIS 2625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-omaha-v-frank-bros-footwear-inc-scotus-1949.