City of Omaha v. Cochran
This text of 46 N.W. 920 (City of Omaha v. Cochran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The question involved in the cases is precisely the same as in the City of Omaha v. The Howell Lumber Co., just decided (ante, p. 633). The reasons for adhering to our former decisions, that the owner of the land in all cases is entitled to the value of the portion taken, are stated in that case. That rule we deem in accordance with justice and as a check upon the abuse of corporate power. It is simply applying the rule that where the property of an individual is taken from him he shall receive an equivalent that is available in satisfaction of his debts, or, if he so desire, in the purchase of other property. The judgments in each of the above cases are
Appirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 N.W. 920, 30 Neb. 637, 1890 Neb. LEXIS 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-omaha-v-cochran-neb-1890.