City of Olney v. Gaddis

Appellate Court of Illinois

City of Olney v. Gaddis

90 Ill. App. 622, 1900 Ill. App. LEXIS 182

DecidedSeptember 8, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 90 Ill. App. 622 (City of Olney v. Gaddis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Olney v. Gaddis, 90 Ill. App. 622, 1900 Ill. App. LEXIS 182 (Ill. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Creighton

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a suit in assumpsit by appellant against appellee, in the Circuit Court of Richland County, to recover from appellee certain moneys which had been assessed against the property within the limits of the city of Olney and had been collected by William Parker, the county collector, and by him paid over to appellee, Charles J. Gaddis, as treasurer of the commissioners of high ways of the town of Olney. Appellant claims that said collector should have paid the moneys over to William J. Cummings, as treasurer of the city of Olney.

To the declaration, appellee pleaded non-assumpsit. Trial was before the court without a jury, by agreement. The finding of the court was in favor of appellee and judgment was rendered against appellant for costs.

This record discloses no right of action in appellant against appellee. There is no privity. This exact state of case was before the Appellate Court of the Third District, in the Town of Rushville v. The President, etc., of Rushville, 39 Ill. App. 503, in which the authorities are cited and discussed at length, and was again before the same court in City of Charleston v. Commissioners of Highways of the Town of Charleston, 52 Ill. App. 41.

The principal question raised and urged in appellant’s brief can not be determined in this case, and a discussion of that question by this court, • at this time, can serve no proper purpose.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Creighton

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a suit in assumpsit by appellant against appellee, in the Circuit Court of Richland County, to recover from appellee certain moneys which had been assessed against the property within the limits of the city of Olney and had been collected by William Parker, the county collector, and by him paid over to appellee, Charles J. Gaddis, as treasurer of the commissioners of high ways of the town of Olney. Appellant claims that said collector should have paid the moneys over to William J. Cummings, as treasurer of the city of Olney.

To the declaration, appellee pleaded non-assumpsit. Trial was before the court without a jury, by agreement. The finding of the court was in favor of appellee and judgment was rendered against appellant for costs.

This record discloses no right of action in appellant against appellee. There is no privity. This exact state of case was before the Appellate Court of the Third District, in the Town of Rushville v. The President, etc., of Rushville, 39 Ill. App. 503, in which the authorities are cited and discussed at length, and was again before the same court in City of Charleston v. Commissioners of Highways of the Town of Charleston, 52 Ill. App. 41.

The principal question raised and urged in appellant’s brief can not be determined in this case, and a discussion of that question by this court, • at this time, can serve no proper purpose.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 Ill. App. 622, 1900 Ill. App. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-olney-v-gaddis-illappct-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack