City of Ocala v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Florida

City of Ocala v. Thompson

132 So. 697, 101 Fla. 1014

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 27, 1931·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is, hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Buford, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is, hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Buford, J.J., concur.

City of Ocala v. Thompson, 132 So. 697, 101 Fla. 1014 (Fla. 1931).

Pincite

132 So. 697 (City of Ocala v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.