City of Ocala v. Red Oak Farm, Inc.
This text of 636 So. 2d 81 (City of Ocala v. Red Oak Farm, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, City of Ocala (“City”), appeals an order of the trial court dismissing the City’s petition for eminent domain on a parcel of land owned by appellee, Red Oak Farm, Inc. (“Red Oak”). Appellant argues that the trial court erred in applying Chapter 180, Florida Statutes, to the City. We affirm.
FACTS
The city council of Ocala adopted resolution 92-41 authorizing the city attorney to file a condemnation proceeding to acquire land necessary for the construction of an electrical substation. No other resolutions were passed affecting this condemnation. When the City filed the petition in eminent domain seeking the condemnation of certain property, including “Parcel 1” owned by Red Oak, it failed to attach a copy of a resolution setting forth a zone or area and prescribing reasonable regulations concerning its intent to construct a utility in the zoned territory because the land sought to be condemned is outside the city limits.
Red Oak moved to dismiss the petition alleging that the City failed to comply with the jurisdictional requirements of Chapter 180,1 Florida Statutes. Specifically, Red Oak argued that by failing to pass a proper resolution proposing construction or extension of the utility pursuant to section 180.03, Florida Statutes (1991), or by passing an ordinance [83]*83or resolution authorizing construction or extension of the utility pursuant to section 180.-04, Florida Statutes (1991), the City failed to comply with the required statutory provision necessary to sustain a petition for condemnation. The trial court agreed and dismissed the petition. The City properly appeals.
We hold that Chapter 180 is applicable and does allow the City to exercise its authority to construct an electrical utility outside the city limits. However, in order to take a property owner’s land by eminent domain, the statutory provisions of a petition in eminent domain, as defined by section 73.021,2 Florida Statutes (1991), must be strictly complied with for a valid condemnation. A defective petition will not allow a landowner’s property to be taken. Tosohatchee Game Preserve, Inc. v. Central & Southern Fla. Flood Control Dist., 265 So.2d 681 (Fla.1972). Because the petition did not have the proper resolutions attached and did not comply with Chapter 180, we affirm the trial court.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
636 So. 2d 81, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2705, 1994 WL 94192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-ocala-v-red-oak-farm-inc-fladistctapp-1994.