City of Ocala v. Red Oak Farm, Inc.

636 So. 2d 81, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2705, 1994 WL 94192
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 25, 1994·No. No. 92-2488·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

THOMPSON, Judge.

Appellant, City of Ocala (“City”), appeals an order of the trial court dismissing the City’s petition for eminent domain on a parcel of land owned by appellee, Red Oak Farm, Inc. (“Red Oak”). Appellant argues that the trial court erred in applying Chapter 180, Florida Statutes, to the City. We affirm.

FACTS

The city council of Ocala adopted resolution 92-41 authorizing the city attorney to file a condemnation proceeding to acquire land necessary for the construction of an electrical substation. No other resolutions were passed affecting this condemnation. When the City filed the petition in eminent domain seeking the condemnation of certain property, including “Parcel 1” owned by Red Oak, it failed to attach a copy of a resolution setting forth a zone or area and prescribing reasonable regulations concerning its intent to construct a utility in the zoned territory because the land sought to be condemned is outside the city limits.

Red Oak moved to dismiss the petition alleging that the City failed to comply with the jurisdictional requirements of Chapter 180,1 Florida Statutes. Specifically, Red Oak argued that by failing to pass a proper resolution proposing construction or extension of the utility pursuant to section 180.03, Florida Statutes (1991), or by passing an ordinance [83] or resolution authorizing construction or extension of the utility pursuant to section 180.-04, Florida Statutes (1991), the City failed to comply with the required statutory provision necessary to sustain a petition for condemnation. The trial court agreed and dismissed the petition. The City properly appeals.

We hold that Chapter 180 is applicable and does allow the City to exercise its authority to construct an electrical utility outside the city limits. However, in order to take a property owner’s land by eminent domain, the statutory provisions of a petition in eminent domain, as defined by section 73.021,2 Florida Statutes (1991), must be strictly complied with for a valid condemnation. A defective petition will not allow a landowner’s property to be taken. Tosohatchee Game Preserve, Inc. v. Central & Southern Fla. Flood Control Dist., 265 So.2d 681 (Fla.1972). Because the petition did not have the proper resolutions attached and did not comply with Chapter 180, we affirm the trial court.

AFFIRMED.

HARRIS, C.J. and PETERSON, J., concur.

Footnotes

(2) Any municipality may extend and execute all of its corporate powers applicable for the accomplishment of the purposes of this chapter outside of its corporate limits ...

Section 180.03, Florida Statutes (1991), reads in part:

(1) When it is proposed to exercise the powers granted by this chapter, a resolution or ordinance shall be passed by the city council ... reciting the utility to be constructed or extended and its purpose ...

Section 180.04, Florida Statutes (1991), reads in part:

If after the passage of said resolution the said city council ... shall determine to proceed toward the construction of said utility ... the said city council ... shall pass an ordinance or resolution authorizing the construction of the utility or any extension thereof, reciting the purpose and the territory to be included ...

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Ocala v. Red Oak Farm, Inc., 636 So. 2d 81, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2705, 1994 WL 94192 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

636 So. 2d 81 (City of Ocala v. Red Oak Farm, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Hallandale Beach v. Smith
853 So. 2d 495 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
DEPT. OF ENVIRON. PROTECTION v. Gibbins
696 So. 2d 888 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)