City of Oakland Park v. Mason

Supreme Court of Florida

City of Oakland Park v. Mason

161 So. 2d 2

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedFebruary 21, 1964

DocketNo. 32659

StatusPublished

This text of 161 So. 2d 2 (City of Oakland Park v. Mason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Oakland Park v. Mason, 161 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After having heard arguments of counsel and having studied the briefs, the transcript of record as well as the order of the Florida Railroad and Public Utilities Commission, we have decided that there is a conflict in the testimony and that the order of such Commission is supported by competent, substantial evidence on each of the issues which Chapter 367, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. requires the Commission to consider and determine. It is not proper for this Court on petition for certiorari to re-weigh or re-evaluate the evidence. Townsend Fruit Company v. Mayo, Fla.App., 98 So.2d 345; De Groot v. Sheffield, Fla., 95 So.2d 912.

The petition for certiorari should be and it is hereby denied.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and THORNAL, CALDWELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., and SCOTT, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After having heard arguments of counsel and having studied the briefs, the transcript of record as well as the order of the Florida Railroad and Public Utilities Commission, we have decided that there is a conflict in the testimony and that the order of such Commission is supported by competent, substantial evidence on each of the issues which Chapter 367, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. requires the Commission to consider and determine. It is not proper for this Court on petition for certiorari to re-weigh or re-evaluate the evidence. Townsend Fruit Company v. Mayo, Fla.App., 98 So.2d 345; De Groot v. Sheffield, Fla., 95 So.2d 912.

The petition for certiorari should be and it is hereby denied.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and THORNAL, CALDWELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., and SCOTT, Circuit Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 So. 2d 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-oakland-park-v-mason-fla-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack