City of Norcross v. Taylor

277 S.E.2d 327, 157 Ga. App. 335, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 1810
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in City of Norcross v. Taylor. Read the opinion of the Court — 153 Ga. App. 836
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 3, 1981·No. 61363·Published

Opinion

Quillian, Chief Judge.

For a detailed recitation of the facts and issues of this case see City of Norcross v. Taylor, 153 Ga. App. 836 (267 SE2d 255). In that case we reversed for a determination of whether the plaintiffs acted in conformity with Section 10 (1) of the Norcross Water and Sewer Ordinance so as to establish that payments they made to the City were not “voluntary” as contemplated by Code § 20-1007.

The trial judge conducted a hearing and issued an order, containing findings of fact and conclusions of law, which determined that the plaintiffs made the payments “under urgent and immediate necessity” and did comply with Section 10 (1) of the Ordinance. The defendants appeal.

The evidence being sufficient to authorize the judgment, and no error of law appearing, we find no basis to disturb the trial judge’s order.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Norcross v. Taylor, 277 S.E.2d 327, 157 Ga. App. 335, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 1810 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981).

277 S.E.2d 327 (City of Norcross v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Norcross v. Taylor
267 S.E.2d 255 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)