City of Niagara Falls v. New York Central Railroad

31 A.D.2d 780, 297 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4759
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 16, 1969
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 31 A.D.2d 780 (City of Niagara Falls v. New York Central Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Niagara Falls v. New York Central Railroad, 31 A.D.2d 780, 297 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: This being a condemnation proceeding as distinguished from an appropriation ease, the power of the court to review the award of the Commissioners is strictly limited. (Matter of Huie, 2 N Y 2d 168.) We find no irregularities in the proceeding, the award is not based on an erroneous principle of law and it does not shock the sense of justice or conscience of the court. (Appeals from order of Niagara County Court, confirming report of Commissioners of Appraisal.) Present — Bastow, P. J., Goldman, Del Veeehio, Witmer and Henry, J J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MatterofNoboavInternationalShoppes,Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Rome Urban Renewal Agency v. Sanzone
51 A.D.2d 678 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
New York State Urban Development Corp. v. Goldfeld
50 A.D.2d 1068 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 A.D.2d 780, 297 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-niagara-falls-v-new-york-central-railroad-nyappdiv-1969.