City of Newark v. Public Service Co-Ordinated Transport
160 A. 654, 109 N.J.L. 270, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 328
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Bodine, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Newark v. Public Service Co-Ordinated Transport, 160 A. 654, 109 N.J.L. 270, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 328 (N.J. 1932).
160 A. 654 (City of Newark v. Public Service Co-Ordinated Transport) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Meadowlands Reg. Dev. Agency v. State
270 A.2d 418 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)
NJ Highway Authority v. Sills
268 A.2d 308 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)
McGowan v. Maryland
366 U.S. 420 (Supreme Court, 1961)
Jasaitis v. City of Paterson
150 A.2d 55 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1959)
Hertz Washmobile System v. South Orange
124 A.2d 68 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
State v. Grabinski
206 P.2d 1022 (Washington Supreme Court, 1949)
Deese v. City of Lodi
69 P.2d 1005 (California Court of Appeal, 1937)
Mazzarelli v. City of Elizabeth
164 A. 898 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1933)