City of New York v. Unsafe Structure No. 142-11 130th Avenue

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

City of New York v. Unsafe Structure No. 142-11 130th Avenue

60 A.D.2d 630, 400 N.Y.S.2d 172, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14611

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 19, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 60 A.D.2d 630 (City of New York v. Unsafe Structure No. 142-11 130th Avenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of New York v. Unsafe Structure No. 142-11 130th Avenue, 60 A.D.2d 630, 400 N.Y.S.2d 172, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14611 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the City of New York from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 2, 1976, which condition[631]*631ally granted respondent’s motion to hold the Borough Superintendent of the Department of Buildings, Housing and Development Administration of the City of New York, for the Borough of Queens, in contempt of court. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion denied. We find no warrant in this record for holding the Borough Superintendent of the Department of Buildings in contempt of court. It would be anomalous to hold the borough superintendent in contempt for not doing something for which the respondent is primarily responsible. Shapiro, J. P., Hawkins, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the City of New York from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 2, 1976, which condition[631]*631ally granted respondent’s motion to hold the Borough Superintendent of the Department of Buildings, Housing and Development Administration of the City of New York, for the Borough of Queens, in contempt of court. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion denied. We find no warrant in this record for holding the Borough Superintendent of the Department of Buildings in contempt of court. It would be anomalous to hold the borough superintendent in contempt for not doing something for which the respondent is primarily responsible. Shapiro, J. P., Hawkins, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.2d 630, 400 N.Y.S.2d 172, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-new-york-v-unsafe-structure-no-142-11-130th-avenue-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack