City of New York v. Unsafe Building & Structure

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

City of New York v. Unsafe Building & Structure

213 A.D.2d 402, 624 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2407

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 6, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 213 A.D.2d 402 (City of New York v. Unsafe Building & Structure) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of New York v. Unsafe Building & Structure, 213 A.D.2d 402, 624 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2407 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an unsafe building proceeding pursuant to Administrative Code of the City of New York § 26-235, Joseph Gerónimo appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated December 19, 1991, which denied his motion to vacate an order of the same court (Levine, J.), dated April 21, 1988, granted upon default, which directed the Superintendent of Buildings for the Borough of Richmond to demolish an unsafe building owned by him.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Since the building which was the subject of these proceedings has been demolished, the dispute is now academic (see, Matter of Gold-Greenberger v Human Resources Admin., 77 NY2d 973; Heller v Trustees of Town of E. Hampton, 198 AD2d 331). In any event, the court correctly denied the motion to vacate the demolition order. Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an unsafe building proceeding pursuant to Administrative Code of the City of New York § 26-235, Joseph Gerónimo appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated December 19, 1991, which denied his motion to vacate an order of the same court (Levine, J.), dated April 21, 1988, granted upon default, which directed the Superintendent of Buildings for the Borough of Richmond to demolish an unsafe building owned by him.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Since the building which was the subject of these proceedings has been demolished, the dispute is now academic (see, Matter of Gold-Greenberger v Human Resources Admin., 77 NY2d 973; Heller v Trustees of Town of E. Hampton, 198 AD2d 331). In any event, the court correctly denied the motion to vacate the demolition order. Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 A.D.2d 402, 624 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-new-york-v-unsafe-building-structure-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack