City of New York v. Strategic Development Concepts, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

City of New York v. Strategic Development Concepts, Inc.

304 A.D.2d 356, 756 N.Y.S.2d 843, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3744

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 8, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 304 A.D.2d 356 (City of New York v. Strategic Development Concepts, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of New York v. Strategic Development Concepts, Inc., 304 A.D.2d 356, 756 N.Y.S.2d 843, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3744 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, [357]*357Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Madden, J.), entered December 3, 2001, which denied the motion of defendant Strategic Development Concepts to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The pleadings more than sufficed to put defendant on notice of the rent deficiencies claimed by plaintiff lessor. As the IAS court found, any defense that plaintiff failed to meet its obligations under the lease so as to preclude its claim to recover rent is not amenable to resolution in the present procedural context. Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Rosenberger and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, [357]*357Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Madden, J.), entered December 3, 2001, which denied the motion of defendant Strategic Development Concepts to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The pleadings more than sufficed to put defendant on notice of the rent deficiencies claimed by plaintiff lessor. As the IAS court found, any defense that plaintiff failed to meet its obligations under the lease so as to preclude its claim to recover rent is not amenable to resolution in the present procedural context. Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Rosenberger and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

304 A.D.2d 356, 756 N.Y.S.2d 843, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-new-york-v-strategic-development-concepts-inc-nyappdiv-2003.