City of New York v. Stolpensky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

City of New York v. Stolpensky

1 A.D.2d 784, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6590

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in City of New York v. Stolpensky. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 A.D.2d 95 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 23, 1956·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. The following question is certified: Was the order of this court entered December 29, 1955, properly made? Motion for a stay pending appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without prejudice to an application to vacate such stay in the event such appeal be not prosecuted diligently. Present ■—Beldock, Acting P. J-., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ. [See ante, p. 95.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. The following question is certified: Was the order of this court entered December 29, 1955, properly made? Motion for a stay pending appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without prejudice to an application to vacate such stay in the event such appeal be not prosecuted diligently. Present ■—Beldock, Acting P. J-., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ. [See ante, p. 95.]

City of New York v. Stolpensky, 1 A.D.2d 784, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6590 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

1 A.D.2d 784 (City of New York v. Stolpensky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.