City of New York v. Stolpensky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

City of New York v. Stolpensky

1 A.D.2d 784, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6590

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 23, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 784 (City of New York v. Stolpensky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of New York v. Stolpensky, 1 A.D.2d 784, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6590 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. The following question is certified: Was the order of this court entered December 29, 1955, properly made? Motion for a stay pending appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without prejudice to an application to vacate such stay in the event such appeal be not prosecuted diligently. Present ■—Beldock, Acting P. J-., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ. [See ante, p. 95.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. The following question is certified: Was the order of this court entered December 29, 1955, properly made? Motion for a stay pending appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without prejudice to an application to vacate such stay in the event such appeal be not prosecuted diligently. Present ■—Beldock, Acting P. J-., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ. [See ante, p. 95.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 784, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-new-york-v-stolpensky-nyappdiv-1956.