City of New York v. Robbins Men & Boys Wear Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

City of New York v. Robbins Men & Boys Wear Corp.

75 Misc. 2d 104, 347 N.Y.S.2d 249, 1973 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1783

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1973

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 75 Misc. 2d 104 (City of New York v. Robbins Men & Boys Wear Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of New York v. Robbins Men & Boys Wear Corp., 75 Misc. 2d 104, 347 N.Y.S.2d 249, 1973 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1783 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Subdivision b of section B15-37.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, with respect to the payment of rent after the vesting of title, applies to “ All persons in possession ” and therefore clearly encompasses one in the position of a subtenant. We also find that the provision made for the determination of rent was a proper exercise of authority by the city (Municipal Home Rule Law, § 10, subd. 1, par. a, cl. [6]; General City Law, § 20, subd. 2).

Final judgment in favor of tenant respondent unanimously reversed, with $30 costs to petitioner landlord, and final judgment directed to be entered in favor of petitioner for the amount sought in the petition.

Concur — Schwartzwald, P. J., Rinaldi and Cone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Subdivision b of section B15-37.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, with respect to the payment of rent after the vesting of title, applies to “ All persons in possession ” and therefore clearly encompasses one in the position of a subtenant. We also find that the provision made for the determination of rent was a proper exercise of authority by the city (Municipal Home Rule Law, § 10, subd. 1, par. a, cl. [6]; General City Law, § 20, subd. 2).

Final judgment in favor of tenant respondent unanimously reversed, with $30 costs to petitioner landlord, and final judgment directed to be entered in favor of petitioner for the amount sought in the petition.

Concur — Schwartzwald, P. J., Rinaldi and Cone, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 Misc. 2d 104, 347 N.Y.S.2d 249, 1973 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-new-york-v-robbins-men-boys-wear-corp-nyappterm-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack