City of New York v. Philips

259 A.D.2d 584, 684 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2470
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in City of New York v. Philips. Read the opinion of the Court — 272 A.D.2d 568

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to enjoin a nuisance pursuant to Administrative Code of the City of New York § 7-706, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mastro, J.), dated February 26, 1998, which denied its motion for partial summary judgment on the cause of action for a permanent injunction.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff failed to establish its entitlement to a permanent injunction on its motion for partial summary judgment (see, Administrative Code § 7-714 [c]; City of New York v Mor, [585]*585173 Mise 2d 971, 974; cf., City of New York v 924 Columbus Assocs., 219 AD2d 19, 22). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of New York v. Philips, 259 A.D.2d 584, 684 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2470 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

259 A.D.2d 584 (City of New York v. Philips) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of New York v. 924 Columbus Associates
219 A.D.2d 19 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)