City of New York v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

City of New York v. County of Nassau

119 A.D.2d 790, 501 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55732

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 119 A.D.2d 790 (City of New York v. County of Nassau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of New York v. County of Nassau, 119 A.D.2d 790, 501 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55732 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that certain tax assessments are null and void, the appeals are from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Widlitz, J.), entered November 10, 1983, as granted that branch of a cross motion by the defendant Village of Valley Stream which was to amend its amended answer to include two additional cross claims against the appellants, and (2) so much of a "modified order” of the same court, entered June 14, 1984, as provided for the same relief.

Appeal from the order dismissed. The order was superseded by the modified order.

Modified order affirmed insofar as appealed from.

The respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, we decline to disturb Special Term’s exercise of discretion. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that certain tax assessments are null and void, the appeals are from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Widlitz, J.), entered November 10, 1983, as granted that branch of a cross motion by the defendant Village of Valley Stream which was to amend its amended answer to include two additional cross claims against the appellants, and (2) so much of a "modified order” of the same court, entered June 14, 1984, as provided for the same relief.

Appeal from the order dismissed. The order was superseded by the modified order.

Modified order affirmed insofar as appealed from.

The respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, we decline to disturb Special Term’s exercise of discretion. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 A.D.2d 790, 501 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-new-york-v-county-of-nassau-nyappdiv-1986.